The epistemology of resistance gender and racial oppression, epistemic injustice, and resistant imaginations jose medina studies in feminist philosophy. As a result, epistemic injustice makes a significant contribution, not just to epistemology, but to all of the disciplines. In this exploration of new territory between ethics and epistemology, miranda fricker argues that there is a distinctively epistemic type of injustice, in which someone is wronged specifically in their capacity as a. Power and the ethics of knowing, miranda fricker sets out to explore the idea that there can be a distinctively epistemic kind of injustice 1. Although we have experienced epistemic injustice either in the role of acting it against others, or in the role of suffering because others act epistemic injustice against us, only miranda fricker could see this important issue so clearly and i am really grateful to her for bringing in the open her thoughts on actually everyday observation which just passes. Narrative fiction and epistemic injustice cunliffe 2019 the. E pi s t e m i c i n j u s t i c e this page intentionally left blank epistemic injustice power and the ethics of knowing m irand a fric ke r 1 1 great.
View epistemic injustice research papers on academia. Miranda fricker distinguishes two forms of epistemic injustice. It explores how agents capacities to make assertions and provide testimony can be impaired in ways that can involve forms of distinctively epistemic injustice. For more information, check out the introduction post and the list of upcoming topics. The dual aim of this article is to reveal and explain a certain phenomenon of epistemic injustice as manifested in testimonial practice, and to arrive at a characterisation of the antiprejudicial intellectual virtue that is such as to counteract it. Reading ethics, cowritten with sam guttenplan forthcoming, blackwell, 2008, and she coedited the cambridge companion to feminism in philosophy cup, 2000 with jennifer hornsby. You are also encouraged to think about epistemic justice, and ways that we could nd structural solutions for the problem of epistemic injustice. The central premiss of this book is that traditional epistemology has gone wrong in ignoring the many ways in which epistemic. Papers discussed explored or applied the concept of epistemic. This article contains just a definition and optionally other subpages such as a list of related articles, but no metadata. Miranda fricker, fba born 12 march 1966 is an english philosopher who is currently presidential professor of philosophy at the city university of new york graduate center. Fricker argues that since reason is often what is seen to make humans distinct from other species and individuals. Dec 20, 2017 talk given by alex millertate as part of the challenges to wellbeing. In both testimonial and hermeneutical injustice, the hearer misses out on something epistemically valuable, and the speaker suffers an injustice.
The first theory of epistemic injustice was introduced in 2007 by british philosopher miranda fricker, who coined the term. Discriminatory epistemic injustice miranda fricker largely initiated the debate on what constitutes epistemic injustice, with epistemic injustice 2007, where she explores the proposition that there is a distinctively epistemic kind of injustice, in which an individual is wronged specifically in her capacity as a knower 2007. Fricker coined the term epistemic injustice, the concept of an injustice done against someone specifically in their capacity as a knower, and explored the concept in her 2007 book epistemic injustice. In a recent survey of current trends or fads in academic philosophy, one of the top 5 was the evolving work in epistemic injustice. I believe this is motivated by her belief that frickers injustice centered framework is too inflexible. The notion of epistemic injustice challenges the individualism of mainstream epistemology by drawing attention to the effects of social identity prejudice on knowledge practices.
Institutionalised science communication and epistemic injustice. Justice is one of the oldest and most central themes of philosophy, but sometimes we would do well to focus instead on injustice. The characterization of these phenomena casts light on many issues, such as social power, prejudice, virtue, and the genealogy of knowledge, and it. Pdf fricker epistemic injustice power and the ethics of knowing. The second is closely based on miranda frickers concept of epistemic injustice. Adopted from elements of marxist theory, feminist standpoint theory also represents one of the more thorough attempts to ground epistemology and, correspondingly, a view of knowers in a social theory. The first of these concepts is explained through a critique of alvin goldmans veritistic social epistemology. The book explores two different types of epistemic injustice, each driven by a form of prejudice, and from this exploration comes a positive account of two corrective ethicalintellectual virtues. Finally, i consider how ongoing conversation concerning epistemic injustice might be broadened to accommodate the phenomenon of epistemic. In this elegant and groundbreaking work, fricker names the phenomenon of epistemic injustice, and distinguishes two central forms of it, with their two corresponding remedies. Abstract this article looks at the role that narrative fictionfilm, television, and literaturecan play in countering and mitigating epistemic.
But this sphere of epistemic practice can be structurally prejudiced by unequal relations of power, so that some groups suff er a distinctive kind of epistemic injustice hermeneutical injustice. By studying the negative space of epistemic injustice, the positive space of epistemic justice is re. Introduction in her recent book epistemic injustice. Miranda fricker, epistemic justice as a condition of. In this interview miranda fricker, author of a recent book on the topic, explains this concept which lies at the intersection. Epistemic injustice explores the idea that there is a distinctively epistemic kind of injustice injustice which consists in a wrong done to someone specifically in their capacity as a knower. The epistemology of resistance paperback jose medina.
Power and the ethics of knowing, miranda fricker describes two kinds of epistemic injustice, testimonial and hermeneutical. From citizendium, the citizens compendium epistemic injustice. Fricker coined the term epistemic injustice, the concept of an injustice done against someone specifically in their capacity as a knower, and explored the concept in her. In 1, i will briefly highlight four broad ways a testimonial exchange might fail. Regarding testimonial injustice i will focus somewhat on the shift from. Epistemic injustice occurs as a result of systemic identity prejudice, and is the name of a particular kind of harm done to people in their capacity as a knower. The nature of epistemic injustice ishani maitra, rutgers university, newark july 14, 2010 1. I will present some respects in which the ideas of testimonial injustice and hermeneutical.
Miranda fricker on epistemic injustice testimonial injustice occurs when others fail to treat you seriously as a source of knowledge. Testimonial injustice occurs when prejudice causes a hearer to give a deflated level of. Power and the ethics of knowing in 2007, epistemic justice has been one of the hottest issues in academic philosophy. Following the conference understanding epistemic injustice, organised by the department of philosophy in 2014, we have made available material from the conference to facilitate further discussion on the topic of epistemic injustice. Combine multiple files into one pdf using adobe acrobat pro x. A positive conception can work towards reducing injustices. Apr 17, 2014 in this paper we argue that ill persons are particularly vulnerable to epistemic injustice in the sense articulated by fricker epistemic injustice. Feminist social epistemology stanford encyclopedia of. It will also be very useful for those in related fields, such as cultural studies, sociology, education and law. Understanding epistemic injustice program keynote 1 epistemic injustice revisited miranda fricker university of sheffield i will present some respects in which the ideas of testimonial injustice and hermeneutical injustice have evolved since 2007.
The pdf of the article gives specific page references. Epistemic injustice is unfairness related to knowledge. Sep 28, 2009 epistemic injustice explores the idea that there is a distinctively epistemic kind of injustice injustice which consists in a wrong done to someone specifically in their capacity as a knower. Epistemic injustice hardcover miranda fricker oxford. In this exploratory paper, i consider how intellectual humility and epistemic injustice might contribute to the failure of testimonial exchanges. Miranda fricker 2012 calls our attention to the phenomenon of epistemic injustice, or wrongs done against a person speci. Epistemic injustice department of philosophy university. In this exploration of new territory between ethics and epistemology, miranda fricker argues that there is a distinctively epistemic type of injustice, in which someone is wronged specifically in their capacity as a knower. The book reveals epistemic injustice as a potent yet largely silent dimension of discrimination, analyses the wrong it perpetrates, and constructs two hybrid ethicalintellectual virtues of. In previous work i have explored how the wrong of both kinds of epistemic injustice has both an ethical and an epistemic significancesomeone is. In this paper we argue that ill persons are particularly vulnerable to epistemic injustice in the sense articulated by fricker epistemic injustice.
Jul 05, 2007 in a recent survey of current trends or fads in academic philosophy, one of the top 5 was the evolving work in epistemic injustice. Power and the ethics of knowing 2007 has also become an essential reference in critical social epistemology. As a source of testimony, they are treated unjustly. The genesis of this trend started in 2007 when miranda fricker, then a professor in the philosophy department at birkbeck, university of london shook the philosophical world with this book. As the title conveys, fricker is working in the newly fertile borderland between theories of value and of knowledge. It was a bad but entirely dispensable philosophical idea to try to merge them. Epistemic injustice and illness can, of course, operate simultaneously, pulling in different directions, especially since hermeneutical marginalization is often allied to wider forms of social. Two concepts of epistemic injustice episteme cambridge. Although both relational autonomy theory and theories of epistemic injustice are gaining increasing traction, within and outside philosophy, much philosophical work remains recalcitrantly individualistic and blind to the effects of social positionality on our agential and epistemic capacities.
Fricker, miranda 2008 forum on miranda frickers epistemic injustice. However, in so doing, i depart from the mainstream approach, presented most influentially by miranda fricker, by suggesting that an account of epistemic injustice sensitive to interlocking oppressions must take us beyond injustice to human knowers. In this post, i will explain what fricker means by epistemic injustice, and why it is such an interesting and important idea. For critical discussions of frickers book, see the book symposia in ibarra 2008, goldman 2010 and bohman 2011. But my present aim is to show that this wrong can also have a political significance in relation to nondomination, and so to freedom.
Go to file, select create, then select combine files into a single pdf a new window will open, titled combine files. Ochunyeye mi oga ni gbogbo ibu, laye nibo gbogbo o. Members of groups against whom there is widespread prejudice are the most obvious victims. Justice is one of the oldest and most central themes in philosophy, but in order to reveal the ethical dimension of our epistemic practices the focus must shift to injustice. Justice is one of the oldest and most central themes in philosophy, but in order to reveal the ethical dimension of our epistemic practices the focus. Miranda frickers important study of epistemic injustice is focussed primarily on testimonial injustice and hermeneutic injustice. This sort of injustice occurs when prejudice on the part of the hearer leads to the speaker receiving less credibility than he or she deserves.
Our pdf merger allows you to quickly combine multiple pdf files into one single pdf document, in just a few clicks. I argue that there is a tension between these two forms of epistemic injustice and tentatively suggest some ways of. Power and the ethics of knowing, by miranda fricker. Ill persons are vulnerable to testimonial injustice through the presumptive attribution of characteristics like cognitive unreliability and emotional instability that. Powerlessness and social interpretation abstract our understanding of social experiences is central to our social understanding more generally. Although several feminist epistemologists have argued for liberatory. This paper argues that benefiting from epistemic injustice can generate stringent moral obligations with distinctively epistemic content, and that considering epistemic injustice allows us to better appreciate how benefiting from injustice, as a source of moral obligation, should be theorised more generally. Medinas hermeneutical injustice and polyphonic contextualism. Reflections on fricker volume 7 issue 2 christopher hookway skip to main content we use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites.
Since miranda fricker published epistemic injustice. This book offers a new theory of social insensitivity, a new kind of interactionism and contextualism, and a new account of solidarity and activism through the notion of chained agency. Epistemic justice as a condition of political freedom. Welcome to the second weekly discussion of the new round of rphilosophy weekly discussions. In previous work i have explored how the wrong of both kinds of epistemic injustice has both an ethical and an epistemic significancesomeone is wronged in their capacity as a knower.
I defend which aims to blend hinge epistemology with epistemological disjunctivism in order to. Epistemic injustice paperback miranda fricker oxford. According to fricker, there are two kinds of epistemic injustice. Dec 15, 2012 i shall first briefly revisit the broad idea of epistemic injustice, explaining how it can take either distributive or discriminatory form, in order to put the concepts of testimonial injustice and hermeneutical injustice in place. An international journal for theory, history and foundations of science, 23 1.
Epistemic injustice occurs, as fricker introduces the concept, when someone is given less credence than they deserve. Mar 12, 2008 the introduction offers a clear statement of the authors aim. Feminist standpoint theory has done the most to articulate the importance of perspectival differences stemming from social location. Relational autonomy and epistemic injustice anu gender. The routledge handbook of epistemic injustice 1st edition. They are epistemic in that they impact the individual specifically in their capacity as a knower. The negative hybridity of the vices generates the positive hybridity of the correlative virtues. The routledge handbook of epistemic injustice is essential reading for students and researchers in ethics, epistemology, political philosophy, feminist theory, and philosophy of race. An account of malicious agency in hermeneutical injustice alyssa cirne a symmetrical social power leads to and is simultaneously fed by asymmetrical power in the development of hermeneutical and epistemic tools, such as language, for transmitting information.
1385 1096 71 1457 1624 556 272 489 100 439 1165 1464 747 780 1002 522 1366 770 1165 1250 676 50 593 763 543 1423 223 755 783 258 460 185 1479